With RvdB Solutions, quality really is key. If we would choose to let quality go to save time, I believe you should not build the product at all. Why? Products of bad quality will always cost more money on the long run. They can cause more bugs and cost more time to fix when broken.
Quality is not an act, it’s a habit
For me, quality really is a habit. Whenever I’m working on a project and I see ways to improve the structure, I will point it out and when possible fix it straightaway. This saves time in applying changes in the future and makes the product more robust, causing you less issues and often saving you money.
By not compromising quality, the quantity of what can be done will logically become smaller at first. However, by saving money on future repairs and making it easier to expand the code, on the long run you can get much more work done on your product.
I already have a product, can you improve its quality?
There is a big chance I can, but in most cases when running into a product of really low quality, I would advise to build it up properly from scratch. The core of your product is what needs to be most robust of everything, so when you are trying to create workarounds for a unstable core, it’s bound to melt down at some point. If not the product, your developer will!
When your product has a solid core, but you just want some minor improvements, that’s where I can shine for you. I’ll need some time to analyze the products code properly, then I should be able to make the magic happen.
Latest blog articles
Read the latest blog articles about quality and get inspired!
